Watch the Episodes Here
Watch the Trailers Here
Episode 4:
“NIST’s Collapse Initiation Theory and Computer Modeling – A Potemkin Village
Watch the Entire 2-hour LIVE Broadcast on 8/31/25 with the Lawyers’ Committee Introduction and Q&A:
Watch Just the 50-minute Episode 4:
Watch the Trailer:
A Deep Dive into NIST’s Unprecedented Theory of Thermal Expansion Induced “by Fire”
In Episode 4 of 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom, we present a thorough examination of NIST’s flawed World Trade Center Building 7 collapse initiation theory and explore the numerous problems with their computer modeling of this building’s collapse.
We expose each of the manipulations – from the exaggerated fires that they claimed induced the thermal expansion of long-span beams pushing a girder off of its seat on column 12, causing floor 13 to fall on 12 and so on for 9 floors, in what they claim is a progressive collapse that then moved from one end of the building to the other in 5 seconds, gutting the interior of the building before the exterior falls in free-fall acceleration.
We show:
- that photos from NIST’s own report reveal that the fire had actually burned out on that floor more than an hour before the collapse.
- that the steel beams were fire-proofed and couldn’t have expanded enough to displace the girder A2001.
- that the girder was anchored to the concrete slab with shear studs, so it couldn’t have been displaced.
- that the girder would have expanded in the fire as much as the beams that were pushing it off its seat, and thus would have been trapped behind the extended side plate of the column 79.
- that NIST had omitted the steel stiffeners shown in the drawings that would have kept the bottom girder flange from “folding and thus would have required a 12″ lateral displacement of the girder in order to fall off of its seat on the column.
- that floor 13 couldn’t have fallen on floor 12 because of the 2 other massive girders framed into the column.
- that floor 13 had only 10% of the kinetic force necessary to break the beam-to-column connections beneath floor 12.
- that, if there was a progressive collapse of 9 floors, it would have pulled-in the exterior steel frame, crumpling it like a beer can, and resulted in the breaking up of thousands of granite panels and windows.
- that the NIST claim of a 5-second East to West horizontal progression of collapse actually happened in only 1/2 second, proving that all 18 columns under the West Penthouse and screenwall gave way at once.
We then reveal the 4-year structural re-evaluation of the WTC 7 collapse by one of the top forensic structural engineers in the country, Prof. Leroy Hulsey at the University of Alaska. This dynamic element analysis concluded that fire couldn’t have brought Building 7 down at all, much less suddenly, symmetrically, at free-fall acceleration into its own footprint in 7 seconds. All of the columns in the building had to have been removes all at once – starting at the lower floors – which is what is done in controlled demolitions.
Join us and be a part of the Grand Jury in this investigation of the third worst structural failure in modern history!
9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom relies upon your support to complete the post-production of the last 8 episodes in the series. We are on a roll and we need you now!
For more info about “9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom,” and to watch Episodes 1 through 3, please visit the 911C2C website [2]. [2]
Read about the Episodes
Episode 3:
“The Grand Jury Confronts the Sudden, Symmetrical, Free-Fall Destruction of WTC Building 7”
Our expert witnesses demolish NIST’s theory of collapse — normal office fires. They include Structural Engineers Kamal Obeid and Steve Dusterwald, Highrise Architect Richard Wallace, Architectural Engineer Ross Muir, Veteran Physics Teacher David Chandler, and Professional Explosives Loader Tom Sullivan.
We, Attorney Mick Harrison and Architect Richard Gage, AIA, introduce the signature features of Controlled Demolition to the Grand Jurors, along with the WTC 7 evidence that matches those features.
We invite you to join the experts and evaluate the legally dispositive evidence and assist in the legal process —such as a sudden and symmetrical onset of collapse across the entire roofline proving that “all the columns had to have been removed simultaneously; that it is physically impossible for a free-falling building to crush massive steel columns at the same time; and that a mere 6-story pile left in the footprint of a previously 47-story building means that all the column-to-beam connections also had to have been severed, which is also physically impossible due to small scattered office fires.
Also, consider co-producing 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom today [3]. Your donation will help us complete the post-production editing work that Stev in Australia is so beautifully stitching together as we speak!
Let us know how YOU evaluate the evidence and testimony presented in this third installment of a dozen total episodes in this docu-series from the 9/11 Truth Movement. YOU can participate in the legal process along with us as a virtual Grand Juror! [3] Don’t be left out of the 9/11 justice process. Join us today with your comments!
Episode 2:
“The Grand Jury Meets the Fires of WTC 7 — and the Deception of NIST”
In this episode, Attorney Mick Harrison and Architect Richard Gage, AIA, introduce the mission of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Truth and RichardGage911 to the Grand Jurors, along with the evidence of the few, small, and scattered fires at Building 7 that are claimed by NIST to have brought it down.
We destroy the NIST theory – with the help of our panel of experts for this episode: Firefighter Captain Raul Angulo and Firefighter Erik Lawyer from from Seattle FD, fmr. Fire Chief & Commissioner Chris Gioia from Franklin Square in NY, Highrise Architect David Mack, and Fire Protection Engineer Brendan Mur
Episode 1
9/11 Crime Scene to Courtroom — Public Orientation
The first episode is strictly for the 9/11 Truth Movement and orients you to our entire upcoming set of episodes. Featured are key witnesses and technical experts interviewed by architect Richard Gage, AIA, and insightful legal analysis by attorney Mick Harrison, Litigation Director of the Lawyers’ Committee, who advises the Jurors on the legal relevance of each component of the evidence and how they can be used to identify and indict the real perpetrators of 9/11!
The first 15 episodes expose the overwhelming and irrefutable evidence of the incendiary implosion of Building 7. We filmed on the steps of the US Supreme Court, US District Court, and in our DC Grand Jury board room with our stand-in Grand Jurors, using the best film crew in Washington DC !! The rest of the series dives straight into the explosive destruction of the Twin Towers.
Read about C2C | Watch Premiere Event:
Watch (Edited Version) of Lawyers’ Committee 9/9 & 9/10 Premiere Event Highlighting “Episode 1 — Public Orientation | 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom” [21]
Complete with the Hi-Res Video Included - and with Q&A!
We were delighted to present to our LIVE audience , on the 9th & 10th of September - the Premiere of this 30-episode series!
The 911C2C Team was on-hand to...
Tour the Upcoming Episodes | 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom – Public Orientation [21]
Thank you for Co-Producing with us the film series 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom — intended not only to wake up the public, but also to be placed right in front of a Special Grand Jury for ultimate justice for...
Co-Produce “9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom” – the Joint LC911-RG911 Film Series! [21]
Phase 1 and Phase 2 are both “in-the-can” and we are officially now in post-production . We’re back from Washington DC filming of the Twin Towers evidence segments of the Film Series !!
Day 1 - Pre-Release Footage Excerpts: On...
DAY 1 – Pre-Release Film Footage & Fundraiser – 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom – Help Us Make History TODAY !! [21]
A Whole Week of New 'C2C' Footage; A $54K Phase 2 Fundraiser; The Unique Opportunity for 9/11 Truth Breakthrough!
It’s Day 1 of 8 as we begin our C2C Phase 2 Campaign for the Film Series 9/11: Crime Scene to...
C2C Experts speak out on "X"!
Richard Gage, AIA
Architect
David Chandler
Physics Teacher
Steven Jones, PhD
Physics Professor (Retired)
Niels Harrit, PhD
Associate Chemistry Professor (Emeritus)
Tom Sullivan
Explosives Loader
Patrick Dillon
First Responder
You Can Co-Produce the C2C Film Series!
Stills from C2C
Rough Cuts & Working Sketches
Richard Gage, AIA
Testifies to Stand-In Grand Jurors
Supreme Court w/ Mick Harrison
Featured Guest
K Street Scene
Mick H. & Richard G.
Heartbeat Opener
Elevator & Hallway Scene
Drive Toward Capitol - Opening Credits
District Court Statements (Option)
Meet the C2C Experts & First Responders
Patrick Dillon
9/11 Rescuer
Mark Lillie
Explosives Expert
Andre Rousseau
Seismic Geophysicist
Prof. Leroy Hulsey
PhD, Forensic Structural Engineering
Fire Capt. Raul Angulo
Author, "Engine Company Fireground Operations"
Christopher Gioia
Fire Commissioner, NY
Brendan Murphy
Fire Protection Engineer
FDNY Capt. Richard Patterson
First Responder
David Mack
Highrise Architect
Kamal Obeid, SE.
Structural Engineer
In-depth Interviews
Jon Cole, Civil Engineer: 9/11 and the Scientific Method – Part 1 -Motion [26]
[26]An engineer who focuses in the actual motion of the Twin Towers. He makes it soooo clear as to what’s actually happening to the Towers that a seventh grader can see...
Captain Richard Patterson, FDNY First Responder – Spills the Beans on 9/11 [27]
[27]Explosions at the Twin Towers; Picking up Aircraft Parts; Paramilitary at Building 7 . Captain Richard Patterson, FDNY, ret., was an institution himself in the New York Fire Department. He...
Erik Lawyer – Founder “Firefighters for 9/11 Truth” & “Protecting All Protectors Alliance” [28]
[28]PAPA Educates 500 Fire Protection Professionals in Boston . Our esteemed guest on RichardGage911:UNLEASHED! today is Erik Lawyer, a veteran Seattle firefighter who we, in the 9/11 Truth Movement, know...
Captain Raul Angulo, Seattle Fire Dept, Ret. – “Big WTC 7 Problem: NIST or NFPA? Not Both!” [29]
[29]This 38-year veteran Seattle firefighter is in between a rock and hard place. Our guest on RichardGage911:UNLEASHED! is a former firefighter who is currently stirring up a hornets nest over...
Mark Lillie, Military Explosives Expert, Demolishes NIST WTC Collapse Theory [30]
[30]Mark Lillie: Propellants, Explosives, & Pyrotechnics Engineer . How does an explosives expert look at the collapse of 3 skyscrapers on 9/11? What does he see - that we don’t?...
David Chandler: The Simple Physics of the World Trade Center collapses [31]
[31]Just how fast is free-fall acceleration? And what does it mean when a building collapses that fast? Our guest on RichardGage911:Unleashed! brings you back to high school and shows how...
Kevin Ryan, Chemical Engineer: “Demolition Access to the WTC, 9/11 Suspects” [32]
[32]Demolition Access to the WTC, 9/11 Suspects [33]- Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center towers? To answer that question, we should first consider who had access...
David Chandler, Physics Teacher: “WTC Towers in the High School Physics Lab” [34]
[34]Back-to-School and Hands-on with the Physics Tool Kit! Come and learn first-hand with the number one 9/11 physics teacher, Mr. Chandler, in the physics lab class! You will be seated...
David Chandler, Physics Teacher: “The Simple Physics of 9/11!” [35]
[35]"Easy Lessons Drawn from the Destruction of the World Trade Center Skyscrapers." He is best known for his measurements demonstrating the absolute freefall of World Trade Center Building 7, proving...
Christopher Gioia – Firefighter, Fire Chief, Fire Commissioner: “The Resolution in New York: Fire Commissioners Demanded New WTC Investigation” [36]
[36]Our guest led all 5 of his fellow commissioners in a revolt against the official WTC collapse narrative! He lost three close firefighting friends on 9/11 - then worked the...
Chemistry Prof. Niels Harrit, PhD – “The Chemistry of 9/11 and Beyond” [37]
[37]Our Guest is scientist Niels Harrit PhD, the lead author of the groundbreaking 2009 peer-reviewed paper “Active Thermitic Materials in the World Trade Center Dust” published in the Bentham Open...
Captain Richard Patterson, FDNY, First Responder Spills the Beans on 9/11 [38]
[38]Explosions at the Twin Towers; Picking up aircraft parts; Paramilitary at Building 7 . Captain Richard Patterson, FDNY, ret., was himself an institution within the New York Fire Department. He...
C2C "On The Set"
Co-Produce 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom!
Donate to Keep the Episodes Coming!
$20,000 Must Still be Raised!!
*** [40]
C2C Community - Q&A, Participation, More!
Sue the NY Times [41]
From Greg Slepak:
Please take a page from Alex Jones' lawsuit's book and sue the NYTimes. If they can sue Jones, you can sue the NYTimes!
...A Frank Review Is Called For [41]
From Larry Edwards:
I joined AE911 at just about the beginning, and continue hope for (and push for as I can) exposure of what happened, and resolution.
I am writing...
The Israeli ambassador Stayed In London [41]
From C.D.:
On 9/11, I was living in London [...] it became clear that the Met Police was given pre-information about an event that would happen [...] the Israeli ambassador...
One of the Hijacked Planes May Have Landed Safely [41]
From J. Allen:
I recall on 9/11/01 that some local news station (I think in Ohio) reported (probably through Fox News?) that one of the hijacked planes landed safely at...
A Thorough Understanding of the Legal Challenges Was Very Helpful [41]
From Jay W:
Gratitude to all involved in this undertaking. This first episode sets the stage nicely for what will follow. Getting a thorough understanding of the legal challenges was...
Thorough and on point but… [41]
From Christine M:
The information given in episode one was thorough and on point but please lighten up on the overly dramatic music and the pretend ‘question and answer’ discussions....
…Left Me Chomping At the Bit For More! [41]
From Patricia R:
I've been following Richard Gage since the inception of A&E. This one-hour premiere was way too short for me, since it left me chomping at the bit...
Other Buildings Did Not Collapse [41]
From: Shqiponja M M:
Why was Building 7 the only structure that collapsed after the Twin Towers?
...Isn’t NIST’s Work Sufficient? [41]
From __________:
Have you considered asking a grand jury merely to look at NIST's evidence of WTC 7's collapse explanation to judge whether they've provided enough proof to conclude that...
Would Whodunnit Undermine Scientific Evidence? [41]
From ________________ :
Should a grand jury decide upon the whodunnit for criminal prosecution, isn't it possible that a failure to conclusively prove guilt by the perpetrator(s) could lead to...
***
About...
9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom
This extraordinary film project was birthed from the partnership of RichardGage911 [55] with the Lawyer’s Committee for 9/11 Inquiry [56]. As such we focus on presenting the technical evidence at the World Trade Center in the context of a Grand Jury investigation. This film series will bring the evidence and eyewitness testimony right to our sitting virtual Grand Jury, which will include the public as participating virtual grand jurors at home.
This film series features architect Richard Gage, AIA along with attorney Mick Harrison who are on a career-long journey to educate the public and plead in the courts with the packaged explosive evidence, to include the already-submitted 60 exhibit-petition. The film will bring alive these exhibits and will be submitted as a supplement to the original petition. In addition it will be submitted to federal judge for a Special Grand Jury investigation.
Our Social Media Platforms
[57]
[58]
[59]Our Video Platforms
[60]
[61]
[62]