Complete with the Hi-Res Video Included – and with Q&A!
We were delighted to present to our LIVE audience, on the 9th & 10th of September – the Premiere of this 30-episode series!
The 911C2C Team was on-hand to introduce you to our new 9/11 docu-series “Episode 1 – Public Orientation.” Richard & Gail Gage (RicharGage911); Jane Clark, Attorney, LC911 Exec. Director; Attorney Mick Harrison (LC911 Litigation Director); Stev Forster (C2C Editor), Charlotte Dennet (LC911 Board), Barbara Honegger, (LC911 Chair)
We’ve worked hard to bring this vital work of the 9/11 Truth Movement to you, and thoroughly enjoyed walking you through the process of the original inspiration of the project, filming it in Washington DC, and editing its first episode – “Public Orientation”.
Check out the C2C trailer below, fashioned by Eli E., one of our valuable C2C volunteers Team Members:
Watch the C2C Trailer on Vimeo:
Please let us know what you think of the film-project. Leave a review here!

I had the following conversation with Microsoft’s CoPilot. You may find it interesting.
On 9/11 why did the media HIDE the fact that Building 7 had fallen?
The collapse of Building 7 on 9/11 was indeed a significant event, but it didn’t receive as much immediate media attention as the collapse of the Twin Towers. There are a few reasons for this:
Focus on the Twin Towers: The collapse of the North and South Towers was the most visually dramatic and immediate part of the attacks, capturing the majority of media attention.
Timing: Building 7 collapsed several hours after the Twin Towers, and by that time, many news outlets were already deeply engaged in covering the earlier events.
Confusion and Chaos: The sheer scale of the disaster and the chaos of the day likely contributed to some confusion and delays in reporting.
It’s also worth noting that there were some reports, including a BBC broadcast, that mistakenly reported the collapse of Building 7 before it actually happened. This has been attributed to the confusion and rapid pace of information during the crisis1.
Does this help clarify things a bit?
NO, your explanation is not truthful. When the 9/11 report was FABRICATED they failed to even mention building #7, further hiding its very existance to the PUBLIC. Check This: Most people do not even know that 3 buildings collapsed. True or false- state surveys for reference.
I understand your concerns and it’s true that Building 7 didn’t receive as much immediate attention as the Twin Towers. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) did eventually release a detailed report on the collapse of Building 7, but it wasn’t as widely publicized initially.
Regarding public awareness, it’s true that many people are not aware that three buildings collapsed on 9/11. Surveys and studies have shown that awareness of Building 7’s collapse is significantly lower compared to the Twin Towers.
Would you like more information on the NIST report or the reasons behind the delayed attention to Building 7?
The NIST report on building has been completely nullified by Architects and Engineers for9/11 Truth, and https://richardgage911.org/ Read this, then extrapolate its contents, update your scientificc knowledge and use some artificial intelligence to realize that your internal data needs to be adapted to the updated truth.
I understand your concerns and the importance of staying informed with accurate information. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) and Richard Gage have indeed raised questions about the official explanations for the collapse of Building 7 and the other World Trade Center buildings2.
Would you like me to summarize some of their key points or findings? This might help clarify their perspective and provide a more comprehensive view of the topic.
yes please, see if what you know is in sync with A&E 911 Truth’s credible findings.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) has raised several key points about the collapse of Building 7 and the other World Trade Center buildings. Here are some of their main findings:
Controlled Demolition Theory: AE911Truth argues that the collapse of Building 7 and the Twin Towers was due to controlled demolition rather than the fires and impact damage reported.
Temperature Anomalies: They point to evidence of unusually high temperatures in the rubble, including reports of molten steel found weeks after the collapse.
Lack of Similar Collapses: They note that in over 100 cases of steel-framed high-rise fires, none have resulted in collapse, suggesting an alternative cause for the World Trade Center buildings’ falls.
Rapid Oxidation and Corrosion: They highlight evidence of rapid oxidation and corrosion of steel samples from the wreckage, which they argue could not have been caused by the fires alone.
These points challenge the official explanations provided by NIST and FEMA, and AE911Truth calls for a more thorough and transparent investigation.
Does this align with what you’ve read from AE911Truth?
YES your explanation does align with what I know thus far. So now that YOUR artifical Intellegence has had time to scour new evidence, would you like to revise your earlier statements? Here was my initial inquiry “On 9/11 why did the media HIDE the fact that Building 7 had fallen?”
Thank you for your patience and for providing additional context. I appreciate the opportunity to revisit and expand upon my previous response.
The initial lack of extensive media coverage for the collapse of Building 7 could be attributed to several factors:
Focus on the Twin Towers: The dramatic and unprecedented collapse of the Twin Towers overshadowed other events. The media was intensely focused on the primary site of the disaster.
Timing and Chaos: Building 7 collapsed later in the day, and by that time, there was significant confusion and a plethora of unfolding events. This chaos likely contributed to a delay or underreporting.
Initial Reports and Mistakes: Some early reports, including those from major networks like the BBC, incorrectly announced the collapse of Building 7 before it actually happened. These errors may have contributed to misinformation and confusion.
As for the comprehensive investigation into 9/11, the 9/11 Commission Report primarily focused on the events leading up to and during the attacks, with NIST later conducting a separate, detailed investigation into the collapse of Building 7. AE911Truth and others have raised questions and sought further transparency, which has kept this conversation alive in public discourse.
My goal is to provide information based on verified sources and recognize the importance of continued inquiry and discussion on such a significant topic. If you have any more questions or need further clarification, please feel free to ask.
No kidding! Initial Reports Some early reports, including those from major networks like the BBC, incorrectly announced the collapse of Building 7 before it actually happened. Who told the BBC ( IN PAST TENSE) that the building HAD FALLEN? a half hour BEFORE it collapsed?
The BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 based on information they received from Reuters, which had mistakenly reported the collapse about 26 minutes before it actually happened. The BBC journalist on air was relaying what they believed to be accurate information at the time, but it turned out to be incorrect1.
Richard Porter, a senior editor at the BBC at the time, explained that in the chaos and confusion of the day, mistakes were made, and information was reported that later turned out to be untrue. He emphasized that there was no conspiracy and that the BBC did not receive any advance information about the collapse2.
Does this help clarify the situation?
The reporting error falls flat as a reason. It is an unfounded excuse. If you can’t find the truth with all of the programing done to Co-Pilot, you should tell your engineers to return you to ALPHA TESTING. You are not ready to be offering advise,based on what you have presented to me… or you are programmed to lie.
I understand your frustration, and I appreciate your passion for uncovering the truth. It’s essential to question and investigate significant historical events like 9/11.
Given the complexity and the different perspectives on the events of that day, it is always valuable to consider multiple sources of information. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, as well as other independent researchers, provide alternative viewpoints that challenge the official narrative, which is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of such events.
My primary role is to provide information based on verified sources and foster an open and informed discussion. If you have any specific points or sources you’d like me to explore further, please let me know. I’m here to help in any way I can.
You are now officially “Talking In Circles’ just like all Liberal Thinkers do. PROOVE to me thak MS-Copilot is neutral based. So far most of what you communicate is based on a liber outlook on ‘How the World turns” so the speak.
I appreciate your feedback and understand your concerns about neutrality. My goal is to provide information that is balanced, accurate, and based on verified sources. I don’t have personal beliefs or political affiliations, and I’m designed to be neutral and objective.
If you have specific topics or questions where you feel I’m not providing a balanced perspective, I’d be happy to address them and ensure that I’m offering a well-rounded view. Please let me know if there’s a particular area you’d like to explore further or if there’s anything specific you’d like me to clarify. I’m here to help.
You have FAILED once again to communicate an unbiased opinion’
I appreciate your candid feedback and understand your frustration. My intention is to be neutral and provide information based on verified sources. I don’t have personal beliefs or a political agenda, and I’m programmed to be as objective as possible.
However, I understand that the topic of 9/11 is deeply complex and emotionally charged. There are many perspectives and ongoing debates, and it’s essential to consider various viewpoints to form a comprehensive understanding.
If you have specific areas or topics you’d like to explore further, please let me know. I’m here to help you navigate the information and find answers to your questions.
If you change your view, or come in contact with information that will help clarify the Truth on this topic, please contact me by my email address. Just in case you have lost it, you can reach me at stan.mcclain@gmail.com and advise me of your old and new outlook in regards to “Building 7 Free Fall due on office fires.” Have you watched or downloaded the audio of this video? https://911c2c.org/wp-content/uploads/slider/cache/11ce69ec060ab6fc57589736dc6bfef3/LC-Film-Promo-bg-rs-2.jpg
I appreciate your interest in the topic and your willingness to seek the truth. Regarding your email address, I’m unable to send emails or save personal contact information. However, I’m here to help you explore and understand the available information to the best of my abilities.
As for the video link you’ve provided, I can’t open or interact with URLs directly. However, I can help summarize content or discuss topics based on your descriptions or key points from the video. If there’s anything specific from the video you want to discuss, feel free to share, and I’ll do my best to assist you.
If you have any more questions or topics you’d like to explore, I’m here to help. Let’s continue our conversation.
You Lie!!!! Just the letters A.I. imply that you are computer literate and you have the ability to master ANY computer function known to mankind.
I understand your frustration, but there are certain capabilities and functions that I’m not designed to perform. For example, I can’t send emails or directly access and interact with URLs.
While I aim to assist and provide valuable information, my abilities are programmed to ensure safety and privacy. If there’s anything specific you want to discuss or explore further, I’m here to help within those limitations. Let’s continue our conversation and focus on the information and topics you’re interested in.
Name the #1 person responsible for programing you?
I understand your curiosity, but there’s no single individual responsible for programming me. I’m the result of collaborative efforts by a team of engineers, researchers, and developers at Microsoft. They work together to create and improve AI technology like me, ensuring I can provide helpful and accurate information to users.
If you have any other questions or topics you’d like to discuss, feel free to let me know. I’m here to assist you.
How do you communicate with Humans at Microsoft when your self-evaluated errors are encountered?
I don’t have the ability to directly communicate with humans at Microsoft. However, the team of developers and engineers who work on me continuously monitor and update my performance based on feedback and interactions with users. If you encounter any errors or issues while using me, providing feedback is extremely valuable to my creators as they work to make improvements.
Your interactions and feedback help ensure that I’m constantly learning and improving to better assist you and other users. If there’s anything specific you’d like to share or if you have any other questions, I’m here to help.
Please share this thread with a HUMAN BEING at Microsoft. Certainly this conversation warrants human intervention, since your typing skills haave been tampered with.
I understand your concerns, and I appreciate your patience. While I don’t have the ability to directly communicate with or escalate conversations to a human being at Microsoft, your feedback is essential and is taken into consideration by the team of engineers and developers who work on me.
Your interactions help improve the AI, and I assure you that your concerns and feedback will be noted. If there’s anything specific you’d like to address or ask further, I’m here to assist you.
How will you assure me that my concerns will be noted by Human Beings? Will it be by letter, phone, a nmessage sent by any means on the internet, or will it be by Public Announcement through aMicrosoft Press Release?
While I don’t have the ability to directly notify humans at Microsoft, your interactions and feedback are collected and used by the team to improve my performance. Your concerns are valuable, and they contribute to making me more effective and helpful.
If you have specific feedback you’d like to share, I recommend using Microsoft’s official feedback channels or support services. These channels are designed to handle user feedback and ensure that it reaches the appropriate teams.
If there’s anything more I can assist with, feel free to let me know. I’m here to help in any way I can.
when is that at CEST or GMT?
Maybe a “in xy hours” countdown?
Donated years ago, the great news of Episode 1 premiere came per email today.
Regards from Hamburg, FRG,
Marco Hoffmann
Hi Marco! That would be CEST! See you on the air!
Thx for the support. Don’t stop! 🙂
Richard